A group of contributing editors at Photoblogs Magazine have undertaken the task of calling to your attention noteworthy photobloggers who are subscribers at Photoblogs Magazine. This is not a contest or an opportunity for submission. The editors simply peruse the subscribers' list looking for photoblogs that they feel are noteworthy. We will publish a new spotlight every Wednesday (or thereabouts).
Wanda Scott: Cariboo Images and Thoughts...
http://photographer52.blogspot.com/
click on thumbnails for full images
Photoblogs Magazine: There is a place on the
blogsphere where time seems to stand still, and one enters a
world of magical images from another age of the world. It is
Wanda Scott's photoblog, Cariboo Images and
Thoughts, home of many fascinating pinhole photographs and
polaroid manipulations.
Dear Wanda, can you explain to us how
these techniques work?
Wanda Scott: Oh, gosh, I feel almost
overwhelmed when asked this question
about pinhole photography...how does this technique work?
My first reaction of course is a head full of calculation,
values and technical equations. I then do a reality check,
reminding myself that most people would be thoroughly bored
with such detailed accounts, so I will proceed with my usually
simple speech that I give to high school students. Pinhole
photography is lensless photography, meaning that you are
taking photographs without a lens. In its place is just a
pin-hole; that's it, nothing more. As for the camera itself,
you can use any container, as long as you can make it light
tight, where no light may enter except through the pinhole.
The film or light sensitive paper (this is the photographic
paper that is used in darkrooms to print an image on) is then
loaded into the camera container on the opposite wall from the
pinhole, and it's then ready to use. Now this is a simplified
version of what happens next. Light is bounced off of
the image you have the camera pointed at and those light rays
come blasting through the pinhole and burn the image onto the
film or paper. Of course, the image will be burned in inverted
and reversed, but that is easily fixed later. Depending on
how strong the light from the sun is, and also the subject that
is being photographed, will be part of the calculations in
determining exposure times. Other factors are the pinhole size
in relationship to the distance from film/paper to pinhole.
But that is starting to get too technical, so lets leave that
alone for now. The bottom line is, it's so simple, it really is
magic.
My SX70 Polaroid manipulated images, is just a new technique
for me (last year). As with everything else, I read an article
in a magazine on this and decided to give it a try. The old
SX70 Polaroid Land Cameras are no longer made, but are readily
available through second hand camera stores etc. The film for
these cameras is still available today, and is called Polaroid
Time-Zero film. The wonderful characteristics of this film, is
that the 'gel' part of the film will stay soft for quite a few
hours. While the 'gel' is soft, you can apply pressure to it,
using any blunt hard object. This pressure, and of course
depending on how much pressure you use, will move the 'gel'
around, creating a impressionistic look to the photograph. I
have also found that, depending on when you start manipulating
the image and how much pressure you apply, you can also change
the colours of the image. Different heat temperatures of the
film also factor into this process. It's fun, it's quick
(compared to pinhole work), and I'm thoroughly addicted to
it at the moment.
PM: A recurring theme of your photography is
the landscape of rural Canada, where you live. Tell us about
it and how living in close contact with nature affects your
artistic creation.
WS: I have lived in a rural setting all my
life. I remember the first time a landscape scene affected me,
I was a child of 8 years and we had been out on a family drive
to a new part of the area that I had never seen before. I
remember looking out of the car window and being so overwhelmed
by what I saw, I started to cry. (Thoroughly bewildering my
parents of course.) I guess that's why I photograph landscapes
mostly; it's what I am drawn to, and it continues to
emotionally affect me even now. I also had a tremendous
fascination with cameras at an early age; my first camera was
at age 6. Great joy was not only having a camera, but in also
dismantling it to see exactly how and why it worked. From there
my interest evolved, with cameras, and light.
PM: Many of your pinhole photographs portray
old towns looking like the set of western movies at the time of
the gold rush. Do you possess a time machine?
WS: I wish I did. I would love to go back to
the mid to late 1800's and experience that time in our history
on the west coast of Canada. I am very fortunate, I live
close to an area in central BC which has a reconstructed
historic gold rush town called Barkerville. A lot of my
pinhole images are from this township, and it seems very
fitting for me to be using a pinhole format rather than digital
to capture these historic structures. Somehow it all just
fits in perfectly for me, as if time stands still when using a
pinhole camera in these settings. I also live in a mainly ranching area, so I am still in a mildly 'wild west'
atmosphere; things still a little rough around the edges but
very fitting for my pinhole work.
PM: In a photoblogs world dominated by
point-and-shoot cameras, and snapshots aiming to document the
ephemeral nature of modern lives, your work seems to go in the
opposite direction. Some of your exposures take hours to be
recorded, and are the result of careful planning in
calculating exposure times and framing your images. What are
your motivations for choosing this highly technical
medium?
WS: It was an evolvement of discovery for
me. I became more drawn in
with photography about 12 years ago, and set up a darkroom,
concentrating mainly on black and white work and 35mm cameras.
Then came some medium format work followed by a digital camera.
After using a digital camera for about one year, I felt like I was
losing touch with the whole aspect of what I had loved
about photography, feeling light, reading light, calculating
light. About this time, I had read an article on pinhole
photography and thought I would give it a try. I will never
forget the feeling when that first fuzzy blurred image
immerged from a tiny cylinder container. I felt like I had
just discovered photography for the first time.
How simple it was, and yet how scientific it was. It has been
a wonderful journey these last few years, and I know there is
more to learn and improve on. I will never be able to achieve
a perfectly toned image, but with every camera I build, I am
getting closer to the mark. I think this is one of the
attractions for me with pinhole work. I will never be able to
perfect it, therefore constantly learning from each image I
take.
PM: The President of a well-known University
has recently made very unfortunate remarks hinting that women
may be less suited than men to do scientific and technical
professions. As a woman dedicated to a form of art which at the
same time requires a deep technical understanding, could you
comment on the presence of biases in our society that
might quell the interest of young girls toward technical
subjects?
WS: It's very unfortunate that there are
still biased ideas like this in our academic fields today. For
myself I can honestly see no difference in gender when it
comes to learning the sciences and technology aspects. As a
society, are we raising boys and girls differently? Are we
subconsciously gearing girls away from sciences?
I remember
when my two boys were small (back in the mid 70's) and the
big discussion back then was to introduce boys to dolls, so
that they would get the natural role playing of nurturers as
little girls seems to naturally do. So of course, out came
some dolls, clothes, doll houses, etc. My boys dismantled the
dolls, to see how their arms, legs and head were attached,
they wanted to see what made their eye's work, so that was
explored and the pulleys were unhinged. As far as the clothes
went, they never did get used on the dolls (parts). Of
course, I can remember doing the very same thing myself when I
was a child. I had a thirst (and still do) to find out how
everything worked, why it worked and what would happen if I
tried doing this or that with it.
I do think we are born with
certain aptitudes. But yet, I think these
aptitudes certainly can be swayed, dampenedd or encouraged by our
peers and society in general. Inherent inferiority, social
inequalities, and institutional bias, to name just a few, are the
roadblocks females encounter in the science and technology
fields. This, I believe, is true.
I strongly believe the
very most important aspect of a child's educational
platform comes from the support of their home life. If it's
strong, supportive and unbiased, the child (no matter what
gender) will achieve whatever they wish to strive for.
posted by Massimo





